Posts Tagged health care
Medicare For All – The Health Care Silver Bullet?
Posted by Max Barron in Economy on September 16, 2009
George McGovern wrote a piece for the Washington Post throwing his support behind a more simplified version of universal health care. A for of public option that has become more and more prevalent amongst the left – as they have discovered that the only way that they are passing HR3200 is by cheating the system. That solution is the universalizing of Medicare. While this idea is far more simplistic than the Rube Goldberg like HR3200 it poses just as many problems – namely the implausibility of it actually working. Read the rest of this entry »
UR Responds to Obama’s Speech to Congress: Part 2
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on September 11, 2009
Once more the Man Child president has descended from Mount Olympus to press his holy cause for the salvation of our health care system and through it, the American people. On September 9 our gracious leader addressed a joint session of Congress to put forth the good word, dismiss the heinous rumors of opponents, and give support to his disciples in Congress… Read the rest of this entry »
UR Responds to Obama’s Speech to Congress: Part 1
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on September 10, 2009
Once more the Man Child president has descended from Mount Olympus to press his holy cause for the salvation of our health care system and through it, the American people. On September 9 our gracious leader addressed a joint session of Congress to put forth the good word, dismiss the heinous rumors of opponents, and give support to his disciples in Congress… Read the rest of this entry »
Shoving Health Care Back From The Brink
Posted by Max Barron in Politics on August 17, 2009
It seems like we astroturfing, right-wing extremist, small minority of people have put a dent in the Obama leviathan… Obamacare. This weekend Barack Obama and Kathleen Sebelius began backing away from the so called “Public Option,” citing it as just “one sliver, one aspect” of the proposed Health Care plan, HR3200. Read the rest of this entry »
UR Responds to Pelosi & Hoyer: Obamacare Dissent.
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on August 10, 2009
Dissent is the highest form of Un-Americanism. More specifically dissent from the policies of The One. Or so says her “Royal Botoxness” Princess Pelosi and her court crier Steny Hoyer in their collaborative Op-Ed published in USA Today. In their world dissent is no longer the highest form of patriotism (as they constantly reminded us during the Bush years) but reporting dissent is! Voicing dissent is distinctly un-American and cannot be allowed. Or so Pelosi and Hoyer would like us to believe. Read the rest of this entry »
It’s My Town Hall And I’ll Cry If I Want To…
Posted by Max Barron in Politics on August 4, 2009
After skimming through the headline stories of the last few days, I’m reminded of the chorus from 1960’s hit “It’s My Party” by Leslie Gore. Change the lyrics a bit and you have the perfect theme song for the whining and moaning of Democrats who are being shouted down in their own town hall events.
The Democrats in Congress and Obama administration officials have joined forces using town hall formats to tour the country and “sell” the American public on their awful health care reform effort. What they hadn’t counted on was the reaction of the American people to this abomination and now they are reduced to huddling in dark corners, crying and cowering in fear as the “unruly mobs” all but pelt them with rotten tomatoes. Read the rest of this entry »
UR Responds to Obama on Obamacare
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on July 22, 2009
On July 21 President Obama delivered yet another canned speech in his string of appearances and speeches promoting his attempt at nationalized health-care. A health-care reform package that is unwanted by the American people and quickly becoming so unpopular – even amongst his fellow Democrats – that the One, himself, must descend from mount Olympus, summon of his dwindling political clout, and stump for it. It is only natural that in the face of the precipitous fall in Obamacare’s popularity that the Man-Child return to the campaign trail – campaigning is his strong suit – after all, it is the only job that Obama has held for more than a year. Read the rest of this entry »
UR Responds to Krugman on Obamacare
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on June 25, 2009
Paul Krugman has once again put his statist foot forward in the duck march for Obamacare. Being the liberal statist hack that he is, it comes as no surprise that he trembles with fear at the very thought that Obamacare might not make it through the vote. While those of us who know better than to allow the government to take over health care, idiots like Krugman wish upon the stars every night that one day we too will be under the thumb of government. Read the rest of this entry »
Publicly Funded Snake Oil
Posted by Max Barron in Uncanned Response on June 12, 2009
President Obama has once again made a return to the one thing that he knows best… the campaign trail, in his efforts to sell Americans on a public health care “option.” His most recent campaign stop was a “town hall” style meeting in Green Bay, WI. – land of cheese, The Packers and Snake Oil sales if Obama has his way.
When the Hall Monitor-in-Chief wasn’t handing out truancy pardons for school kids, he was nobly perched on his soap box peddling his wares like the snake oil salesmen of yore. But what is a Snake Oil salesman without a good heckler to call the product what it is? Since the town hall was filled with friendly ears already punch drunk on the Obamunism Kool-Aide, we will just have to settle with an after the fact heckle.
In remarks prepared for a town meeting here at Southwest High School, the president said he believes “strongly” that health care reform should include “a public insurance option.”
“If the private insurance companies have to compete with a public option, it will keep them honest and help keep prices down,” Obama said.
It is only natural that Obama believes in the “public option.” It is, after all, the only way that the Czar of Czars can gain meaningful control over health care. Don’t be fooled by the salesman’s pitch… It is about control. If it were about competition the plan would open up the health care borders so that companies in other states could actually compete. But that isn’t the goal.
Providing Americans with affordable health insurance, Obama said, is “both a moral imperative and an economic imperative.”
The key words are “providing” and “affordable”. “Providing” puts the lie to the sales pitch – by telegraphing the intent that Obama denies, but we on the right have remained affirmed of — this is backdoor nationalization. The second key word is “affordable.” How, on Earth, is a plan that is currently estimated to cost $1.2 trillion affordable? Trillion and affordable should never be uttered in the same sentence. Not to mention the escalation of cost as people are enrolled in the system. And who is going to pay for it? We are – the 50% of Americans that pay taxes.
“So, to those who criticize our efforts, I ask, ‘What is the alternative?’ ” Obama said. “ ‘What else do we say to all those families who now spend more on health care than housing or food? What do we tell those businesses that are choosing between closing their doors and letting their workers go?’ ”
We certainly don’t sell them a bottle of Snake Oil, call it a cure-all tonic, and send them on their way. Which, to be clear, is precisely what Obama is trying to do. What we should do is allow the insurance providers to broaden their business base, compete against each other, and get the trial lawyers out of the way. Those few simple steps would cause the cost of health care and insurance to plummet. Which would mean no need for Laudanum laced Olive Oil…
“I believe we tell them that after decades of inaction, we have finally decided to fix what is broken about health care in America,” the president concluded.
If the health care troubles are to be “fixed” it won’t be through federal mandates or socialized medicine. It will be through the free market… Otherwise, it isn’t a fix so much as another problem. Kind of like stubbing your toe, and then punching a wall – your toe still hurts like hell, but the busted knuckles take your mind off of the toe. In the end, your still left with a banged up toe and bloody knuckles.
….Oh wait. The Obama cure-all tonic can cure that too, right?
“There are things that can be done that – Republican, Democrat, liberal, conservative – we all know need to happen. The challenge is going to revolve around how do we deal with the 20 percent of the stuff where people disagree?” Obama said. “This whole issue of the public plan is a good example, by the way. I mean, right now, a number of my Republican friends have said, ‘We can’t support anything with a public option.’ It’s not clear that it’s based on any evidence, as much as it is their thinking, their fear that somehow, once you have a public plan, that government will take over the entire health-care system.”
Classic sales technique. Dismiss your competitors’ arguments as irrational fears. It’s a tried and true tactic… It has worked for Door-to-Door, Used Car and infomercial salesmen across the country for decades. Unfortunately, in the end the buyer is still stuck with a lemon, or in this case a cocktail of Laudanum and Olive Oil, and nothing to show for it – except for those easy payments of just 99.99 *per week for life. Don’t let the sales pitch fool you. If there is ever a public option… it will inevitably be the only “option.”
“We’ve got to admit that the free market has not worked perfectly when it comes to health care,” Obama added. “That’s why I’ve said that I think a public option would make sense.
The free market ALWAYS works, when it is the free market. But when regulation prevents the existence of free market conditions… then it naturally doesn’t work perfectly. A public option is the anti-thesis of free market principle. It only makes sense to implement the public option if the destruction of the free market is the goal.
And he cited the cost of Medicare and Medicaid as the “biggest threat” to the federal budget.
Indeed, the medical entitlements are the biggest threat to the budget… so remind us all again why it makes sense to employ a far grander scale version of them for everyone? Forgive the ignorance, but the logic behind that argument escapes me.
“If you’re worried about spending and you’re worried about deficits,” he said, “you need to be worried about the cost of health care.”
And he hit on federal spending, repeating his administration’s line that his health care bill will not add to the deficit over 10 years.
We are all collectively worried about deficits and health care costs. It is ironic that the President, who mentions them, doesn’t seem to be worried at all. In fact he blatantly lies about them. Stating that his health care plan – which has yet to be completely crafted – will not add to the deficit, when he has already stated that it will cost $1.2 trillion plus, is an outright lie. Where is that money coming from? How will it NOT add to the deficit? There simply isn’t enough money to pay for it… not even if the government enacts all of the new and additional taxes that they’ve discussed.
“In all these reforms, our goal is simple: the highest-quality health care at the lowest possible cost,” Obama said. “We want to fix what’s broken, build on what works.”
Guffaw! Ask Canada, the UK, Europe, Russia, etc about quality and cost. If Obama were being honest, he would admit that cost is not really an object. Because with his plan, he can make the co-pays (if there are any) as low as he wants thus fooling the consumer with “low” upfront cost and gouging him on the back end. Because the taxpayers are footing the rest of the bill. And the bill will come due.
As for fixing what is broken and building on what works. If that was the goal then the markets would be opened up, not closed off. But then, that would remove any need for the Obama brand Snake Oil.
Of course, if we’re not buying the snake oil then perhaps Obama can team up with Kennedy on his cross country road trip to drum up support for what I call the Chappaquiddick Health-Care Plan. And If Ted’s driving, I’ll buy the Whiskey Sours. Just sayin’…
Up in Smoke
Posted by Max Barron in Politics on June 11, 2009
A new bill, primarily sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy – the health care crusader, is expected to be passed by the Senate that will grant the Nanny State long sought after regulatory powers over the tobacco industry. Democrats have been seeking legislation that puts the tobacco industry firmly under the thumb of the FDA unsuccessfully for the last two decades. But with a supportive President and overwhelming majorities in both the Senate and the House it looks like their wish will finally be granted.
According to the Washington Post the FDA would be granted wide regulatory powers that will likely harm the industry as a whole… and that is the goal.
The bill would allow the FDA to require changes to nicotine yields and other chemicals in cigarettes and other tobacco products, although it could not ban nicotine. It would require tobacco companies to provide detailed lists of ingredients and any changes in those ingredients.
The bill would ban the use of expressions such as “light” and “mild” that might mislead people into thinking there was less health risk in the product.
The FDA would also have the power to restrict tobacco marketing; require pre-market approval of all new tobacco products; ban candied or flavored tobacco products that anti-smoking groups see as a way to entice young people into smoking; limit ads in publications with significant teen readership; and impose stronger warning labels on cigarette packages.
The new FDA office would be financed through a user fee paid by tobacco companies, based on their share of the market. Earlier this year, Congress raised the federal cigarette tax, by 62 cents to $1.01, to help pay for expansion of a federal health program for children.
Until now the tobacco industry has remained relatively secure and unfettered – with the notable exceptions of advertising regulation. That, however, is about to change. This new bill would not only grant the FDA, and therefore the federal government, unprecedented regulatory powers but it will also stifle industry innovation and likely cost jobs and tobacco farmers’ livelihoods.
It comes as no surprise that the congressional Democrats, who have been lustily targeting this industry for decades, would seek to limit the amount of Nicotine in cigarettes. Nor is it very surprising that the legislation would ban the terms “light” and “mild,” in the interest of “protecting” us from ourselves. What is somewhat surprising is the move to ban flavored tobacco products.
Congressional Democrats believe that the flavored cigarettes intice young people into smoking, though no factual data has been provided. However, the tobacco industry argues that the flavored cigarettes are primarily enjoyed by the 20-something crowd, particularly those that smoke but don’t always like the flavor of regular or menthol cigarettes – which is the target consumer group for those products.
The new bill would also seek to allow the FDA to determine what the industry can advertise and where it can advertise it… in the interest of protecting the fragile and impressionable young people. Parenting was not mentioned.
Funding for the new FDA department will come from likely exorbitant “user” fees paid by the tobacco companies. These fees will ultimately be paid by the consumers through even higher retail prices – which spells trouble for smokers in states like New York who already pay upwards of $6 – $7 per pack. And will also hurt low income consumers, ironically the Democrat core constituency, the most.
Senate Democrats praise the bill as long overdue and a great preventative measure.
This moment has been coming for 20 years,” said Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s second-ranking Democrat. “We’re going to be able to protect millions of children and Americans from deadly tobacco-related disease.”
“This bill may do more in the area of prevention, if adopted, than anything else we may include in the health care bill in the short term,” said Sen. Christopher Dodd
The bill is being pushed as a new preventative step for health care and the overall health of the public. What it fails to address is that once the FDA lowers the amount of Nicotine in cigarettes smokers will likely smoke more to get the same amount of Nicotine. Which would have a reverse effect on the claimed intent of the legislation. Not to mention the untold damage that it will do to the industry itself, the cost to consumers, and the loss of jobs… but then, that is the intent, isn’t it? To send the tobacco industry up in smoke.


